
The Pebble
Six stones. Kraft carton. For the curious, the sceptical, or the dinner guest. Slate.
The right stone. Engineered to skip. Finally.
Start skipping →Every stone is the same — 60mm disc, 5mm thick, polished edges, one grip dent. What changes is the quantity, and the vessel it arrives in.

Six stones. Kraft carton. For the curious, the sceptical, or the dinner guest. Slate.

Twelve stones. Linen drawstring pouch, hand-stamped. The default gift. Slate.

Twenty-four stones. Aluminium cookie tin, 23cm. You were hoping for cookies. Marble.

Every house had one. Round aluminium tin, lived on a shelf, looked promising. You opened it as a kid expecting shortbread. It had a pincushion in it, a thimble, some buttons from a coat that no longer exists.
Ours has 24 perfectly engineered skipping stones in it. Arguably better.
The physics of a skipping stone is, as it turns out, reasonably well understood. A stone skips when it meets the water at a shallow angle and spins fast enough to stay flat against hydrodynamic lift.
The literature converges on four levers: angle of attack (~20°), spin rate, edge geometry, and the stone's mass-to-surface ratio. We tuned the last three. You provide the first.
1 Clanet, C., Hersen, F., & Bocquet, L. (2004). Secrets of successful stone-skipping. Nature 427, 29.
2 Bocquet, L. (2003). The physics of stone skipping. American Journal of Physics 71, 150–155.
3 Rosellini, L., Hersen, F., Clanet, C., & Bocquet, L. (2005). Skipping stones. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 543, 137–146.
4 Nagahiro, S., & Hayakawa, Y. (2005). Theoretical and numerical approach to ‘magic angle’ of stone skipping. Physical Review Letters 94, 174501.
5 Truscott, T. T., Epps, B. P., & Munns, R. H. (2009). Water-skipping spheres. Physics of Fluids 21, 091103.
6 Hewitt, I. J., Balmforth, N. J., & McElwaine, J. N. (2011). Continual skipping on water. Journal of Fluid Mechanics 669, 328–353.
7 Belden, J., Hurd, R. C., Jandron, M. A., Bower, A. F., & Truscott, T. T. (2016). Elastic spheres can walk on water. Nature Communications 7, 10551.
8 Johnson, W., & Reid, S. R. (1975). Ricochet of spheres off water. Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science 17(2), 71–81.
Physics-based simulation of skipping stone dynamics. Adjust the stone, adjust the throw. Every variable the papers identified — then watch the curve sag.
Lift force: F = CL,eff · ρw · vx² · Swetted · sin(α + β) after Clanet et al. (2004). Attack angle efficiency: quadratic penalty away from 20° magic angle. Spin degradation: Ω decays 12% per bounce; effective CL degrades via Δα = 0.0248 + 1516 · Ω−2 deg/bounce (Tang et al. 2021). Integration: semi-implicit Euler, dt = 50 μs.
References: Bocquet (2003) · Clanet, Hersen & Bocquet (2004) · Tang et al. (2021)
We found the paper.
We read the paper.
We didn't fully understand the paper.
But we built the stone anyway.
Look — I skipped a rock. It went across the water. I don't know what else you want from me.
The tin alone is worth it. I put my jewellery in it. The stones are in a bowl. Both things are true.
I hate to admit it but it does, in fact, skip better than a rock from the beach.
I got seven skips on my first throw. Seven. I've been trying since I was eight years old.
Bought it as a joke. Kept it because it's genuinely the most beautiful object on my desk.
My six-year-old beat me. The stones don't care about your ego.
From €14. Ships anywhere in Europe.
Choose your pack →